Rarely has triggered an article in Goggiblog so many reactions, such as the report on the collapse of the youth radio station 4uTV . Many readers responded pleased that "the sharp business practices" of the owner would be made public. Only one thing was the not so great: David von Felten, owner of 4uTV. In this case, the young man from oensingen quite ambitious. He got technical equipment, courted local investors and promised benefits for which he could never fulfill. Several people had to do with von Felten describe him other than "visionary" and "eye wiper. was
4uTV counter on 13 October 2010 and launched on November 29, 2010 per the bankruptcy process, which shortly thereafter by each an appeal decision of the Higher Court of Solothurn canton has been repealed. In general, a bankruptcy procedure initiated only if no appeal is taken against operators be (can). It is later repealed only if the payments in question have been fully provided. In other words, has twice increased from Felten bankruptcy at the last moment turn away, probably by a payment - what the statement 4uTV is broke, but not really cut off the bottom of probability.
denied until a few hours from Felten in a statement forcibly 4uTV on the website which broke and spoke of "lies" spread that I would. In one spiked with a lot of spelling errors Article, he defends himself against "a web blog" of trying "4uTV [...] to draw in the dirt." Next, we read that "the station up to and including 2016 program will remain," it would sponsor "guarantee". The following is an incomplete quotation from the Commercial Register and the announcement 4uTV rchtliche steps to check the "Lord, who has covered this blog."
website temporarily offline
Dear Mr. von Felten
you the right to freedom of expression and an ethical principle, it is every blogger allows accurate and to report to an appropriate text about third parties if it is in the public interest. In the case of a TV station, whose owners have certain obligations are not aware and in various circles of public life caused trouble, this is true with certainty. There is no reason to remove the blog post, especially since all the allegations were true and can be occupied at the time of publication, too. In fairness, this comment was explained the current situation: the two bankruptcy proceedings against "4uTV Felten was repealed. For the time being due to a seizure of appeal (inlet) and later - this is just a guess: by the payment of the debt, at this stage, it is true that 4uTV not bankrupt and can no longer go bankrupt - 4uTV do not make one. . Unfortunately, you have to their readers but concealed. That happens sometimes that you forget a detail. (By the way, can be operated, the former owner of a private company still, but that's another story).
It's pretty brash, a sort of reply "to publish because of" an Internet blog, "without the source of the blog shall be presented and instead to let your readers in the belief that there are all lies and benefits of sponsorship is the mission to 2016 guaranteed. It is even scary as a young man who can live in 10 lines of text to 12 spelling errors, persistent courting of trust and innocence, rather than AT LAST INSPECTION TO SHOW AND TO BE BETTER.
Do not threaten with legal action, but set to a reasonable business model. Are you assuming that someone will check you money is that the promised performance is also provided. In that you now feel great pleasure to delete this comment, you solve the problem and not incidentally.
In other words, the Goggiblog remains with his account and all other is saying. "Prove with which new old TV project you do not tie you"
... read and comment directly on Goggiblog 
0 comments:
Post a Comment