election year-Optimized Single-insurance Sometimes I: the recently published and well worth reading me already, what are the real reasons why parties to take initiatives. Vote on weekends, we voted by now no longer just about the expulsion Initiative from, but about the expulsion
SVP initiative. Or the
SP- tax initiative. The party political preposition to the title makes one sense that it is no longer content to be said, but whether you are a leftist or a rightist. As a left-leaning person, I find myself now sometimes really down to earth right to think. Next opportunity: the popular initiative for a single-class health insurance.
Or rather, the
SP/Grüne- initiative for a single-class health insurance. Once again, we will ask sooner or later the parties prominently on display, and finally this year are also parliamentary elections. The leading symbol suggests even more: As you were, the linker is required for a single initiative to support health insurance. If not, it takes so automatically the right ideas and stands on a par with Blocher, Mörgelis and fountains that make even a step without phone service weapon and exclusively with nuclear power. Which is not about left and so blind pupils now reached 100,000 signatures in time for the general election.
Take advantage will, however,'s nothing. In every respect. First, the SP shall adopt in its opaque political action itself constantly obstacles in the way and second, carries a single-class health insurance little to lower premiums for. On the contrary, large mergers in Germany have shown that it creates huge bureaucracies that lead to inertia in their extra effort. Also not to forget the market consequences: the trade in insurance policies (also because of the compulsory) a billion dollar business. Especially small and only regionally active health insurance companies now offer only a basic service would threaten their existence. The health insurance Agrisano recruits such as your members mostly from rural districts, or the Sumiswalder health insurance is a regionally entrenched, more than 160 year old company. Local offices and thus personal care were at the expense of centrally located public offices, lost modeled after a RAV.
The whole reconstruction had a loss of jobs due to the massive failure in its entirety. Providers of supplemental insurance would be reduced to a handful of companies to which you offer a virtual monopoly.
are Conversely, the insured person on the losing side. Because with all the promises of cantonal uniform premiums, no one can call binding numbers. If this premium is likely to be as deep as those of the Avenir, or rather lie in the segment of Concordia, which requires almost double? If elections are still possible franchises that allow today to 50% premium discount? Be large families relieved? How long does it take to get a consultation? Two days as in the private insurance, or four weeks and now the RAV?
An eye wiper initiative so in two respects. It suggests a benefit, it does not generate a more expensive and slow machine. to live instead of real health policy, election campaign is run on the back of a socially interesting topic. If I now write that this initiative is for me a reason not to elect them more SP, hailing it right back for, "only because" one can not but the political views overthrow ... However, you can. For the SP and her many other parties, reduce themselves to a popular minimum. Ok, then we measure them to it.
